3

I am an avid reader of eBooks and I do that mostly on an iPad. But there are many people who warn of deterioration of eyesight due to continuous exposure to the screen of an iPad. But I can't give up this habit. So what are the best settings I can use on an iPad to ensure my eye sight is saved in the long run, somehow.

closed as off-topic by kenorb, vladiz, MrPhooky, Sterno, J. Musser Mar 16 '15 at 20:49

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Does not seem to need a life hack — A "life hack" is a seemingly intractable problem that can be solved by thinking outside the box. Unfortunately, everyday "How to…" questions about learning a craft or new skill are outside the scope of this site. See about Lifehacks. If the author can show how this needs an "outside the box" solution, edit and 'flag' to reopen." – vladiz, MrPhooky, Sterno, J. Musser
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 2
    I'm voting to close this as off-topic. Asking which settings to use on a piece of software doesn't fit within the scope of Lifehacks. Here is a related meta on this type of question. – Sterno Mar 16 '15 at 18:35
4

Any backlit screen isn't optimal for reading; an e-ink screen such as that on the Amazon Kindle is preferred. But to answer your question...

As to avoid computer vision syndrome, the 20-20-20 rule is very effective. Quoting from this article:

The 20-20-20 rule: Every 20 minutes, take your eyes off your computer and look at something 20 feet (6 metre) away for at least 20 seconds.

I like to use the 204 rule, which is the above, but ALSO using the recommended 20 inches (50 cm) between the monitor/tablet and your eyes.

  • Thanks for that. I'll try it out. But I can't keep an 9.7 inches iPad 20 inches away from me as I'm reading a book, not watching a movie. – SandyShores Mar 16 '15 at 12:16
  • 1
    @SandySands It doesn't have to be that far. The monitor I'm using right now it only 12" away. – Mooseman Mar 16 '15 at 12:19
  • Oh, alright then. – SandyShores Mar 16 '15 at 12:21
  • @Mooseman i will leave this here. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22762257 You don't back your answer with any proof (the first part). – s3v3ns Mar 17 '15 at 14:19

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.